Why does my team stop having ideas when I’m in the room?
Often because you are leading from the front, and to people who have ideas of their own that reads as not being open to theirs. The fix is not to lead less. It is to be able to lead from three positions instead of one.

Leading for ideas is range, not rank.
The small l kind that anyone can do, not the formal leadership of a management position. It is leading for creativity in other people.
This is leading with a small L
Think, do, be. This is not management. It is leading for creativity in other people, which you can do with no authority at all, on a project you are not even on.
Good ideas need leading, because they die easily. The boss is in the room, so nobody says the risky one. Somebody is shouting down every idea but their own. Or the room is simply too far into busy brain, and every new thought is getting killed at birth.
In the absence of anyone leading for ideas, the possibility of new ideas is quietly lost, and nobody in the room will ever know it happened.
The friend who told me I had one setting.
My friend Bernie is an executive coach. He watched me run sessions for a while before he said anything.
Then he told me I led every single one of them the same way.
He was right, and I had never noticed. I had one setting. Up at the front with the pen, seeing where it could go, pulling the room along behind me. It worked often enough that I had mistaken it for competence rather than for a preference.
And the model I built it on came from somewhere unexpected. At BBC Radio 1 we used a brand model about where a brand sits in relation to its audience. Out in front of them. Alongside them, arms around. Or behind them, as a backstop.
That is exactly the choice you make every time you walk into a room where ideas are meant to happen. Leading creativity is an audience relationship. You are picking a position relative to the people whose ideas you actually want.
The three positions
Out in front. Being the idea leader. Follow me, I know where we are going, I have got the ball, I can see and feel the potential here, so come with me. And people do.
Alongside. Being the idea mate. Arms around other people’s creativity. Creative equals. We are in this together, keep going, I am right beside you, supporting and encouraging and wanting to know more, every step of the way.
Behind. Being the idea backstop. Letting others step up. Letting ideas go where they will. Letting other people take their creativity somewhere new, with you behind all of them. Still engaged, still watching, holding the backstop position in case you are needed.
Here is how to find yours. If you were leading an ideas session tomorrow, at your most comfortable, would you be up at the flip chart boldly leading where the ideas go, sitting with others discussing and exploring, or hanging over the back listening and watching where the conversation is heading?
First one, you are a natural out in front. Second, alongside. Third, behind.
None of them is the good one. The whole thing is range.
And I will say the obvious part out loud. There is a page on this site about a session I derailed by standing up and presenting a finished concept at point two of eight. That was not a one-off. That was my home base, running with no awareness that it was even a choice.
What the science says.
Leading from the front actively costs you output in a room full of people with ideas.
Grant, Gino and Hofmann (Academy of Management Journal, 2011) ran this twice.
And range itself is what correlates with results.
Goleman’s Hay/McBer work drew on a random sample of 3,871 executives from a database of more than 20,000, and named six leadership styles. The finding: leaders who had mastered four or more had the best climate and the best business performance. The more styles available to a leader, the better, and the most effective ones switched between them as the situation required.
What to do on Monday.
Name your home base. Use the flip chart question above. Be honest, not aspirational. Most people know within two seconds and then talk themselves out of it.
One specific thing, because it works and almost nobody does it. If one person is dominating the airtime, go and sit beside them. It will shut them right up, without a word being said about it.
Grant, A. M., Gino, F., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: the role of employee proactivity. Academy of Management Journal. Field study: 57 store leaders, 374 employees. Lab study: 163 participants in 56 groups. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.61968043
Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, March 2000. Hay/McBer random sample of 3,871 executives from a database of more than 20,000. Practitioner research, not a controlled experiment. hbr.org/2000/03/leadership-that-gets-results
BIF source: BIF People Behaviours 6. Leading, which carries the Range model (out in front, alongside, behind), the know-your-style test, the comfort/stretch/panic zones and the leading tips.
Origin: Matt Hart on Bernie, his friend and executive coach, and the BBC Radio 1 brand model about where a brand sits in relation to its audience.
The full evidence for Leading, with the room it came from and the citations with DOIs.